Side-by-side water intelligence
Compare water intelligence.
Put cities, states, water systems, or ZIP codes next to each other and read the measurable differences. PurityMap never combines them into a single winner or safety verdict.
CompareUp to 3, side by side. No overall score, rank or verdict. Missing evidence stays missing.
Water systemFARMINGTON CITY WATER SYSTEMUTAH06004 · UT
Add a second systemoptional
Identity
Side by side
BasisEach column shows its latest public record. Sample years can differ between columns, so compare with care.
| Field | FARMINGTON CITY WATER SYSTEM |
|---|---|
| System | FARMINGTON CITY WATER SYSTEM |
| Place | Farmington |
| Population served | 27,860 |
| Source type | Surface Water |
| Record updated | 2026-09-16 |
| Findings on record | 31 |
| Above a listed reference | 0 |
Substance by substance
Where the records differ
Detected results first. Each cell keeps the published result and its record state. “No record” is different from “not detected”.
- Above a reference
- Detected, within reference
- Not detected
- No record
| Substance · reference | FARMINGTON CITY WATER SYSTEM |
|---|---|
| 1H, 1H, 2H, 2H-perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (6:2 FTS)No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | 30ng/LDetected, no limit |
| Lithium10.0 µg/L EPA health reference level (screening, not a legal limit) | 9.8µg/LDetected, within reference |
| Lead (90th percentile)15 µg/L federal action level | 3µg/LDetected, within reference |
Comparison boundary
Continue with one system.
Different monitoring periods, source types and coverage can limit direct comparison. Missing evidence stays missing; it is never scored as favourable, and nothing here is combined into an overall rank or safety verdict.