Updated 2026-09-16
State water report

South Carolina Water Quality: 71 Cities Ranked by the Records

Water quality across 71 cities in South Carolina, drawn from EPA drinking-water records. Each city page shows the measured contaminants and a reproducible Purity Score.

Finding by finding

What South Carolina's records show

Counts of cities whose serving system reported each result. There is no statewide score: PurityMap does not average local records into a statewide safety verdict. 5 cities have a past health-based violation on record.

City rankings

South Carolina cities ranked by the records

Highest first. A summary of each serving system’s record, not a safety verdict.

  1. 1
    Greenville (sc2310001)GREENVILLE WATER (SC2310001) · SC2310001
    Report →
  2. 2
    Greer Cpw (sc2310005)GREER CPW (SC2310005) · SC2310005
    Report →
  3. 3
    Inman Campobello W DINMAN CAMPOBELLO W/D (4220002) · SC4220002
    Report →
  4. 4
    Easley Combined Util (sc3910002)EASLEY COMBINED UTIL (SC3910002) · SC3910002
    Report →
  5. 5
    Fort Mill Town (sc4610003)FORT MILL TOWN OF (SC4610003) · SC4610003
    Report →
  6. 6
    Lcf District (sc4220010)LCF WATER DISTRICT (SC4220010) · SC4220010
    Report →
  7. 7
    West Anderson W DWEST ANDERSON W/D (0420006) · SC0420006
    Report →
  8. 8
    Marco Rural (sc3320001)MARCO RURAL WATER CO (SC3320001) · SC3320001
    Report →
  9. 9
    Pioneer Rural Dist (sc3720001)PIONEER RURAL WATER DIST (SC3720001) · SC3720001
    Report →
  10. 10
    Walhalla City (sc3710004)WALHALLA CITY OF (SC3710004) · SC3710004
    Report →

Showing the top 10 of 71 scored cities.

See all 71 in the table

71 cities, highest Purity Score first

  1. GREENVILLE WATER (SC2310001) · PWSID SC2310001 · Purity Score 100/100 (Excellent) · Confidence: moderate · Assessed at the water-system level
    No PFAS detectedNot detected
  2. GREER CPW (SC2310005) · PWSID SC2310005 · Purity Score 100/100 (Excellent) · Confidence: moderate · Assessed at the water-system level
    No PFAS detectedNot detected
  3. INMAN CAMPOBELLO W/D (4220002) · PWSID SC4220002 · Purity Score 100/100 (Excellent) · Confidence: moderate · Assessed at the water-system level
    No PFAS detectedNot detected
  4. EASLEY COMBINED UTIL (SC3910002) · PWSID SC3910002 · Purity Score 100/100 (Excellent) · Confidence: moderate · Assessed at the water-system level
    No PFAS detectedNot detected
  5. FORT MILL TOWN OF (SC4610003) · PWSID SC4610003 · Purity Score 100/100 (Excellent) · Confidence: moderate · Assessed at the water-system level
    PFAS detected, none above a limitDetected
  6. LCF WATER DISTRICT (SC4220010) · PWSID SC4220010 · Purity Score 100/100 (Excellent) · Confidence: moderate · Assessed at the water-system level
    No PFAS detectedNot detected
  7. WEST ANDERSON W/D (0420006) · PWSID SC0420006 · Purity Score 100/100 (Excellent) · Confidence: moderate · Assessed at the water-system level
    PFAS detected below their limitsDetected
  8. MARCO RURAL WATER CO (SC3320001) · PWSID SC3320001 · Purity Score 100/100 (Excellent) · Confidence: moderate · Assessed at the water-system level
    No PFAS detectedNot detected
  9. PIONEER RURAL WATER DIST (SC3720001) · PWSID SC3720001 · Purity Score 100/100 (Excellent) · Confidence: moderate · Assessed at the water-system level
    No PFAS detectedNot detected
  10. WALHALLA CITY OF (SC3710004) · PWSID SC3710004 · Purity Score 100/100 (Excellent) · Confidence: moderate · Assessed at the water-system level
    No PFAS detectedNot detected
  11. BIG CREEK W/S DISTRICT (0420009) · PWSID SC0420009 · Purity Score 100/100 (Excellent) · Confidence: moderate · Assessed at the water-system level
    PFAS detected below their limitsDetected
  12. YORK CITY OF (SC4610001) · PWSID SC4610001 · Purity Score 100/100 (Excellent) · Confidence: moderate · Assessed at the water-system level
    PFAS detected, none above a limitDetected
Showing 12 of 71.

Ranked by the Purity Score of each city's main water system, highest first. Scores belong to water systems; there is no state score. The score is computed only from contaminants measured in the published EPA record, so this ranks the record, not which city's water is safest. How the score works. See how South Carolina compares with other states.

By contaminant

PFAS and lead in South Carolina

Counties

South Carolina counties

5 counties with city reports
Suppliers

Largest water systems

All water systems →
Full indexAll 71 South Carolina city reports, A–Z
Questions

South Carolina water, frequently asked

FOLLOW SOUTH CAROLINA WATER RECORDS

Get South Carolina updates

We'll email you when South Carolina records change, such as new PFAS or lead results.

Double opt-in: we email a confirmation link. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam.

How does South Carolina tap water compare across cities?

PurityMap ranks 71 cities in South Carolina by the Purity Score of each city's main water system, computed only from contaminants measured in the published EPA record. Scores belong to water systems, not to cities. The highest published score is Greenville (sc2310001)'s main water system: GREENVILLE WATER (SC2310001) · PWSID SC2310001 · Purity Score 100 (Excellent) · Confidence: moderate · Assessed at the water-system level. The ranking compares the records, not which city's water is safest, and your own tap can differ with household plumbing.

How many South Carolina cities have PFAS above the federal limit?

35 cities of 71 had at least one regulated PFAS (PFOA, PFOS or PFHxS) measured above the 2024 federal limit in EPA's UCMR 5 testing, including Laurens County W S Comm (sc3020001) (HFPO-DA (GenX) 95.8 ng/L), Greenwood Cpw (HFPO-DA (GenX) 91.1 ng/L), Winnsboro (PFOS 32.8 ng/L). PFAS were detected at any level in 51.

Is there lead in South Carolina tap water?

Utilities report lead as a 90th-percentile result from home taps. 48 of 71 South Carolina cities reported a value above zero, and none was above the 15 µg/L federal action level. Lead usually comes from a building's own pipes and fixtures, so only a test at your tap tells you what you drink.

Have South Carolina water systems had drinking-water violations?

5 cities in South Carolina have a health-based violation in the federal SDWIS record within about the last ten years. Each city report lists the contaminant, year and whether it was resolved.

Limits, sources and corrections

A statewide page cannot tell you what reaches a specific address. Water quality varies by supplier, sampling period and household plumbing; open a city report for the evidence behind a local result.

Sources: EPA UCMR 5 (PFAS, 2024), SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule 90th-percentile results and health-based violations, and utility Consumer Confidence Reports where on file. Every city report links its dated source records.

Updated 2026-09-16. How PurityMap analyzes water data · Report an error