Side-by-side water intelligence

Compare water intelligence.

Put cities, states, water systems, or ZIP codes next to each other and read the measurable differences. PurityMap never combines them into a single winner or safety verdict.

Compare
Up to 3, side by side. No overall score, rank or verdict. Missing evidence stays missing.
Water systemCITY OF GILROYCA4310004 · CA
Add a second systemoptional
Identity

Side by side

BasisEach column shows its latest public record. Sample years can differ between columns, so compare with care.

FieldCITY OF GILROY
SystemCITY OF GILROY
PlaceGilroy
Population served59,426
Source typeGroundwater
Record updated2026-10-15
Findings on record32
Above a listed reference4
Substance by substance

Where the records differ

Detected results first. Each cell keeps the published result and its record state. “No record” is different from “not detected”.

  • Above a reference
  • Detected, within reference
  • Not detected
  • No record
Substance · referenceCITY OF GILROY
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)4.0 ng/L federal MCL (2024)8ng/LAbove a reference
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)4.0 ng/L federal MCL (2024)5.8ng/LAbove a reference
Lithium10.0 µg/L EPA health reference level (screening, not a legal limit)11µg/LAbove a reference
Nitrate10 mg/L12MG/LAbove a reference
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS)2000.0 ng/L EPA health advisory (screening, not a legal limit)9.4ng/LDetected, within reference
Perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA)No federal or state limit; shown for transparency3.6ng/LDetected, no limit
Perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA)400000.0 ng/L Michigan EGLE state MCL (strictest US state)7ng/LDetected, within reference
Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS)10.0 ng/L federal MCL (2024)3.5ng/LDetected, within reference
Perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPeA)No federal or state limit; shown for transparency7.8ng/LDetected, no limit
Lead (90th percentile)15 µg/L federal action level2µg/LDetected, within reference
Comparison boundary

Continue with one system.

Different monitoring periods, source types and coverage can limit direct comparison. Missing evidence stays missing; it is never scored as favourable, and nothing here is combined into an overall rank or safety verdict.