No open EPA violations as of 2026-10-15.
EPA record checked 2026-10-06
From EPA's record for CA3110008. PurityMap is independent of City of Roseville.
Every community water system publishes one each year.
Read the report ↗As listed in EPA's records. Your water bill names your supplier.
A ZIP code is a postal area, not a water service area. Your water bill names your supplier.
Are you this utility? Correct this listing →
32 results are on record. These 5 come first: results above a listed reference.
| Contaminant | Result | Limit | Status | Sampled | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lithium | 62.6 µg/L | 10 µg/L EPA health reference level (screening, not a legal limit)Screening level, not a legal limit | Above the referenced health-based guidance value | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| Water hardness | 3.5 gpg | Aesthetic, no federal health limit | Within a secondary/aesthetic reference | 2025 | City of Roseville Environmental Utilities 2025 Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) |
| 11-Chloroeicosafluoro-3-oxaundecane-1-sulfonic acid (11Cl-PF3OUdS) | < 5 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| 1H, 1H, 2H, 2H-perfluorodecane sulfonic acid (8:2 FTS) | < 5 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| 1H, 1H, 2H, 2H-perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (4:2 FTS) | < 3 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| 1H, 1H, 2H, 2H-perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (6:2 FTS) | < 5 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| 4,8-Dioxa-3H-perfluorononanoic acid (ADONA) | < 3 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| 9-Chlorohexadecafluoro-3-oxanone-1-sulfonic acid (9Cl-PF3ONS) | < 2 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| Hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid (HFPO-DA) (GenX chemicals) | < 5 ng/L | 10 ng/L federal MCL (2024) | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| Lead (90th percentile) | Non-Detect (ND) | 15 µg/L federal action level | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2022–2024 monitoring period | Lead & Copper Rule 90th-percentile: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| N-ethyl perfluorooctanesulfonamidoacetic acid (NEtFOSAA) | < 5 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| N-methyl perfluorooctanesulfonamidoacetic acid (NMeFOSAA) | < 6 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| Nonafluoro-3,6-dioxaheptanoic acid (NFDHA) | < 20 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| Perfluoro (2-ethoxyethane) sulfonic acid (PFEESA) | < 3 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| Perfluoro-3-methoxypropanoic acid (PFMPA) | < 4 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| Perfluoro-4-methoxybutanoic acid (PFMBA) | < 3 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS) | < 3 ng/L | 2,000 ng/L EPA health advisory (screening, not a legal limit)Screening level, not a legal limit | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| Perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA) | < 5 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| Perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA) | < 3 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| Perfluorododecanoic acid (PFDoA) | < 3 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| Perfluoroheptanesulfonic acid (PFHpS) | < 3 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| Perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA) | < 3 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS) | < 3 ng/L | 10 ng/L federal MCL (2024) | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| Perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) | < 3 ng/L | 400,000 ng/L Michigan EGLE state MCL (strictest US state) | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) | < 4 ng/L | 10 ng/L federal MCL (2024) | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) | < 4 ng/L | 4.0 ng/L federal MCL (2024) | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) | < 4 ng/L | 4.0 ng/L federal MCL (2024) | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| Perfluoropentanesulfonic acid (PFPeS) | < 4 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| Perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPeA) | < 3 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| Perfluorotetradecanoic acid (PFTA) | < 8 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| Perfluorotridecanoic acid (PFTrDA) | < 7 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
| Perfluoroundecanoic acid (PFUnA) | < 2 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-08-24 to 2024-05-09 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: CITY OF ROSEVILLE (CA3110008) |
0health-based violations in the last 10 years · none open as of 2026-10-15
From EPA SDWIS. A clean violation history means no enforcement action was recorded; it does not cover contaminants without a limit. Meeting a federal limit is a compliance fact, not a health clearance.
Screening tells you if something is worth a closer look; a lab result is the number you can act on.
As an Amazon Associate, PurityMap earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate disclosure
Screening: quick check, not lab-grade
Safe Home (EnviroTestKits)
Lead, read as one of three ranges: 0–4, 5–15 or 15+ ppb
Turnaround: 5 minutes
What it can't tell you: It shows a lead range, not an exact level, and tests nothing else unless you pay extra for the optional lab test.
Lab-certified results
ETR Laboratories
50+ substances, including lead, copper, arsenic, nitrate, hardness and coliform bacteria
Environmental Testing and Research Laboratories (ETR Labs), Leominster, MA · ISO/IEC 17025:2017, ANAB certificate AT-2638 · 2–4 business days after the lab receives it
What it can't tell you: It does not test PFAS, and not every result on the panel falls under the lab's accredited scope.
Tested your own tap? Read your results →
One email when a new sampling round is published or a result moves across its reference.
Follow this water →Its phone number on EPA record is 916-746-1764 and its mailing address is 2005 HIlltop Circle, ROSEVILLE, CA 95747. These details come from the system's EPA record.
PurityMap has no verified website for City of Roseville. Its mailing address on EPA record is 2005 HIlltop Circle, ROSEVILLE, CA 95747. Your water bill lists the ways to pay. PurityMap does not take payments.
EPA's records list City of Roseville as serving Roseville, California. Your water bill names your supplier.
PurityMap's record for City of Roseville holds results for 29 PFAS substances. None was detected, and none is above a federal legal limit. Each result links to its source in the city report.
No open EPA violations as of 2026-10-15: that is what EPA's record shows for City of Roseville. The record comes from EPA's SDWIS compliance database.
City of Roseville is on EPA record as drawing from surface water.
Start with the hot-or-cold tap check. Where City of Roseville reported something related, it's shown below.
Lead at City of Roseville: not detected (90th percentile, 2022–2024 monitoring period). Lead has no taste, so a taste neither shows nor rules it out.