PFOS
3× the limitPerfluorooctanesulfonic acid
12ng/L
Each block = 4.0 ng/L federal MCL (2024)
EPA UCMR 5 · sampled 2023Evidence
City water report · 2026
Is New Baltimore Tap Water Safe? 2026 Water Quality Report
Short answer: Two PFAS, PFOA and PFOS, are above their federal limits (2024 limits that water systems have until at least 2029 to meet); lithium sits above a screening level, and a past health-based violation (Combined radium-226/228) is on record. New Baltimore Regional serves 8,818 residents.
Likely match, check your bill
NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL serves New Baltimore
Your water bill or annual water quality report names your actual supplier.
- Source
- Groundwater
- NEW BALTIMORE REGIONALThis reportVA6061318 · 8,818 served
What stands out
Two PFAS above the 2024 federal limit
Each bar is drawn in blocks of the 4.0 ng/L federal MCL (2024), so the length shows how far above it the result sits.
PFOA
1.2× the limitPerfluorooctanoic acid
4.9ng/L
Each block = 4.0 ng/L federal MCL (2024)
EPA UCMR 5 · sampled 2023Evidence
Coverage by group
32 results on record- PFAS (forever chemicals)2 above · 4 detected · 23 not detected
- Metals & lead1 detected
- Disinfection by-productsNot monitored
- Other2 above
Every detected result
9 detected results, by distance from their limit
NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (EPA PWSID VA6061318) delivers groundwater to 8,818 residents. This report reflects 29 individual PFAS result(s) from the source UCMR5 observations and the latest Lead & Copper Rule 90th-percentile result. Water hardness and disinfectant type are pending the utility's own annual report.
- LithiumEPA UCMR 5 · 202310 µg/L EPA health reference level (screening, not a legal limit)34.8µg/LAbove screening
- Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)EPA UCMR 5 · 20234.0 ng/L federal MCL (2024)12ng/LAbove limit
- Combined radium-226/228EPA SDWIS violations · 20175 pCi/L7PCI/LAbove limit
- Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)EPA UCMR 5 · 20234.0 ng/L federal MCL (2024)4.9ng/LAbove limit
- Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS)EPA UCMR 5 · 202310 ng/L federal MCL (2024)6.2ng/LWithin reference
- Lead (90th percentile)EPA SDWIS (Lead & Copper Rule) · 202215 µg/L federal action level2.73µg/LWithin reference
- Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS)EPA UCMR 5 · 20232,000 ng/L EPA health advisory (screening, not a legal limit)5.6ng/LWithin reference
- Perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA)EPA UCMR 5 · 2023400,000 ng/L Michigan EGLE state MCL (strictest US state)8.2ng/LWithin reference
- Perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPeA)EPA UCMR 5 · 2023No federal or state limit; shown for transparency11ng/LDetected · no limit
23 other contaminants tested, none detected
- 11Cl-PF3OUdS
- 4:2 FTS
- 6:2 FTS
- 8:2 FTS
- 9Cl-PF3ONS
- ADONA
- HFPO-DA (GenX)
- NEtFOSAA
- NFDHA
- NMeFOSAA
- PFBA
- PFDA
- PFDoA
- PFEESA
- PFHpA
- PFHpS
- PFMBA
- PFMPA
- PFNA
- PFPeS
- PFTA
- PFTrDA
- PFUnA
Track record
1health-based violation in the last 10 years
From EPA SDWIS. Counted once per contaminant per year, as in the Track record score.
Not in this recordDisinfection by-products weren't monitored in this dataset
No result is not a pass. Your utility's annual water quality report may list them, and a certified lab test covers your own tap.
Health-based violations, last 10 years
Every filing is listed; the Track record score counts at most one per contaminant per year.
- Combined Radium (-226 and -228)
Resolved
- Combined Radium (-226 and -228)MCL
to Resolved
What you can do
Test first, then treat what was found
- 01 · TestTest your own tap
Plumbing inside a home can add lead that the system record can't show. A tap test tells you what reaches your glass.
Certified labHow to test your tap → - 02 · Treat PFASReverse osmosis, or carbon certified for PFAS
PFOS 12 ng/L, above the 4 ng/L limit (+5 more PFAS detected)
NSF/ANSI 58 or 53, with PFOA/PFOS/PFBS/PFHxA/PFHxS/PFPeA named on the listingTreatment for PFAS → - 03 · LeadLead-certified carbon filter, or reverse osmosis
lead 2.73 µg/L, below the 15 µg/L action level
NSF/ANSI 53 (lead)Treatment for Lead →
Test your own tap
Screening tells you if something is worth a closer look; a lab result is the number you can act on.
As an Amazon Associate, PurityMap earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate disclosure.
Screening: quick check, not lab-grade
Safe Home DIY Lead in Drinking Water Combo Test Kit
Safe Home (EnviroTestKits)
Lead, read as one of three ranges: 0–4, 5–15 or 15+ ppb
- Turnaround: 5 minutes
What it can't tell you: It shows a lead range, not an exact level, and tests nothing else unless you pay extra for the optional lab test.
Lab-certified results
ETR Labs Basic Water Quality Test Kit
ETR Laboratories
50+ substances, including lead, copper, arsenic, nitrate, hardness and coliform bacteria
- Analyzed by Environmental Testing and Research Laboratories (ETR Labs), Leominster, MA · ISO/IEC 17025:2017, ANAB certificate AT-2638
- Turnaround: 2–4 business days after the lab receives it
What it can't tell you: It does not test PFAS, and not every result on the panel falls under the lab's accredited scope.
When your results arrive, read them here →
Commercial
Certified for a concern found here
Each card names which New Baltimore findings its current certification covers, and which it doesn't.
As an Amazon Associate, PurityMap earns from qualifying purchases. A product appears here only when a current certification record covers at least one identified concern; every concern stays listed. The retail offer is looked up afterwards and never changes which products appear or their order. Affiliate disclosure.
Under-Sink Filter
Aquasana Claryum 2-Stage Under-Sink Filter (AQ-5200)
- PFOA: eligible, evidence match
- PFOS: eligible, evidence match
- Lead: eligible, evidence match
- Not established: Lithium, Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS), Perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) and 2 more
Not suitable for (5)
- Treating every tap in the home
- A whole-home hard-water or scale problem
- All PFAS: its evidence covers only the compounds it names
- Anyone who can't plumb, drill or hire an installer
- Renters who can't modify plumbing
Under-Sink Filter
Aquasana Claryum 3-Stage Max Flow Under-Sink Filter (AQ-6300M)
- PFOA: eligible, evidence match
- PFOS: eligible, evidence match
- Lead: eligible, evidence match
- Not established: Lithium, Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS), Perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) and 2 more
Not suitable for (5)
- Treating every tap in the home
- A whole-home hard-water or scale problem
- All PFAS: its evidence covers only the compounds it names
- Anyone who can't plumb, drill or hire an installer
- Renters who can't modify plumbing
See all 13 products certified for a New Baltimore concern →
Countertop System
Aquasana Clean Water Machine Countertop Filter (AQ-CWM2)
- PFOA: eligible, evidence match
- PFOS: eligible, evidence match
- Lead: eligible, evidence match
- Not established: Lithium, Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS), Perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) and 2 more
Not suitable for (3)
- Treating every tap in the home
- A whole-home hard-water or scale problem
- All PFAS: its evidence covers only the compounds it names
Countertop System
Patriot Pure Ultimate Water Filtration System
- PFOA: eligible, evidence match
- PFOS: eligible, evidence match
- Lead: eligible, evidence match
- Not established: Lithium, Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS), Perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) and 2 more
Not suitable for (3)
- Treating every tap in the home
- A whole-home hard-water or scale problem
- All PFAS: its evidence covers only the compounds it names
Countertop System
AquaTru Carafe Countertop Reverse-Osmosis Purifier (AT100)
- PFOA: eligible, evidence match
- PFOS: eligible, evidence match
- Lead: eligible, evidence match
- Not established: Lithium, Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS), Perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) and 2 more
Not suitable for (3)
- Treating every tap in the home
- A whole-home hard-water or scale problem
- All PFAS: its evidence covers only the compounds it names
Countertop System
AquaTru Classic Countertop Reverse-Osmosis Purifier (AT2000)
- PFOA: eligible, evidence match
- PFOS: eligible, evidence match
- Lead: eligible, evidence match
- Not established: Lithium, Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS), Perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) and 2 more
Not suitable for (3)
- Treating every tap in the home
- A whole-home hard-water or scale problem
- All PFAS: its evidence covers only the compounds it names
Under-Sink Filter
Waterdrop G3P600 Tankless Reverse-Osmosis System
- PFOA: eligible, evidence match
- PFOS: eligible, evidence match
- Lead: eligible, evidence match
- Not established: Lithium, Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS), Perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) and 2 more
Not suitable for (5)
- Treating every tap in the home
- A whole-home hard-water or scale problem
- All PFAS: its evidence covers only the compounds it names
- Anyone who can't plumb, drill or hire an installer
- Renters who can't modify plumbing
Under-Sink Filter
Waterdrop G3P800 Tankless Reverse-Osmosis System
- PFOA: eligible, evidence match
- PFOS: eligible, evidence match
- Lead: eligible, evidence match
- Not established: Lithium, Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS), Perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) and 2 more
Not suitable for (5)
- Treating every tap in the home
- A whole-home hard-water or scale problem
- All PFAS: its evidence covers only the compounds it names
- Anyone who can't plumb, drill or hire an installer
- Renters who can't modify plumbing
Refrigerator Filter
Whirlpool Filter 3 Refrigerator Water Filter (WHR3RXD1)
- PFOA: eligible, evidence match
- PFOS: eligible, evidence match
- Lead: eligible, evidence match
- Not established: Lithium, Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS), Perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) and 2 more
Not suitable for (3)
- Treating every tap in the home
- A whole-home hard-water or scale problem
- All PFAS: its evidence covers only the compounds it names
Water Pitcher
Brita Elite Water Filter Pitcher
- Lead: eligible, evidence match
- Not established: PFOA, PFOS, Lithium and 4 more
Not suitable for (3)
- Treating every tap in the home
- A whole-home hard-water or scale problem
- All PFAS: its evidence covers only the compounds it names
Water Pitcher
Culligan ZeroWater 10-Cup Pitcher (ZEROP10)
- Lead: eligible, evidence match
- Not established: PFOA, PFOS, Lithium and 4 more
Not suitable for (3)
- Treating every tap in the home
- A whole-home hard-water or scale problem
- All PFAS: its evidence covers only the compounds it names
Faucet Attachment
PUR Plus Faucet Filter (FM2500V)
- Lead: eligible, evidence match
- Not established: PFOA, PFOS, Lithium and 4 more
Not suitable for (3)
- Treating every tap in the home
- A whole-home hard-water or scale problem
- All PFAS: its evidence covers only the compounds it names
Under-Sink Filter
Frizzlife SP99 Under-Sink Filter
- Lead: eligible, evidence match
- Not established: PFOA, PFOS, Lithium and 4 more
Not suitable for (4)
- Treating every tap in the home
- A whole-home hard-water or scale problem
- All PFAS: its evidence covers only the compounds it names
- Anyone who can't plumb, drill or hire an installer
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Is New Baltimore tap water safe to drink?
PurityMap does not give a safe/unsafe verdict; it shows what the public records measured. For New Baltimore, PFOS 12 ng/L and PFOA 4.9 ng/L were measured above the 4 ng/L federal limit in EPA's 2024 testing; the lead 90th-percentile result was 2.73 µg/L against the 15 µg/L action level; one health-based violation is on record (Combined radium-226/228). NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (PWSID VA6061318) has a Purity Score of 53/100 (confidence: moderate), assessed at the water-system level and computed only from contaminants that were measured. Water can change in your own pipes, so a certified test is the only way to know what comes out of your tap.
Who provides tap water in New Baltimore?
NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (PWS ID VA6061318) is the public water system on record for New Baltimore, Virginia, serving about 8,818 people. Confirm the utility on your water bill before acting on a specific finding.
Where does New Baltimore get its drinking water?
Groundwater (primary source of record in EPA SDWIS).
Are PFAS "forever chemicals" in New Baltimore's water?
Yes. In EPA's UCMR 5 testing (2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26), PFOS was measured at 12 ng/L against a 4 ng/L federal limit and PFOA was measured at 4.9 ng/L against a 4 ng/L federal limit. PFBS (5.6 ng/L, below the 2,000 ng/L EPA health advisory), PFHxA (8.2 ng/L, below the 400,000 ng/L state limit) and PFHxS (6.2 ng/L, below the 10 ng/L federal limit) were also detected. PFPeA (11 ng/L) was also detected; it has no federal or state limit. Reverse osmosis and filters certified to NSF/ANSI 53 for PFOA/PFOS reduce them at the tap.
Is there lead in New Baltimore's tap water?
NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL's most recent lead 90th-percentile result (2022–2024) was 2.73 µg/L, below the 15 µg/L action level. That figure comes from sampled homes; lead usually enters from a building's own pipes and fixtures, so only a test at your tap tells you what you drink.
Has New Baltimore's water system had violations?
The federal SDWIS record lists a health-based violation for NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL within about the last ten years: Combined radium-226/228 (2017). The findings above show each one's status.
What does the latest New Baltimore water report show?
PurityMap's current record for New Baltimore holds 32 findings: 4 above a reference, 4 detected within the reference, 1 detected with no limit and 23 not detected. Each finding links to its dated public record; a parameter that was never monitored is shown as pending, not as a pass.
Follow this water
Follow New Baltimore's water
One email when a new sampling round is published, a result moves above or below its reference, or the system's score changes.
Double opt-in: we email a confirmation link. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam.
Sources and dataAll 32 records and their sourcesEPA UCMR 5 · EPA SDWIS (Lead & Copper Rule) · EPA SDWIS violations
| Contaminant | Result | Benchmark | Status | Sampled | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lithium | 34.8 µg/L | 10 µg/L EPA health reference level (screening, not a legal limit)Screening level, not a legal limit | Above the referenced health-based guidance value | 2023-06-13 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) | 12 ng/L | 4.0 ng/L federal MCL (2024) | Above a historical reference; current applicability unverified | 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| Combined radium-226/228 | 7 PCI/L | 5 pCi/L | Above the listed reference | 2017 | EPA SDWIS Violations & Enforcement: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) | 4.9 ng/L | 4.0 ng/L federal MCL (2024) | Above a historical reference; current applicability unverified | 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS) | 6.2 ng/L | 10 ng/L federal MCL (2024) | Within a historical reference; current applicability unverified | 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| Lead (90th percentile) | 2.73 µg/L | 15 µg/L federal action level | Below the listed reference | 2022–2024 monitoring period | Lead & Copper Rule 90th-percentile: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS) | 5.6 ng/L | 2,000 ng/L EPA health advisory (screening, not a legal limit)Screening level, not a legal limit | Within the referenced health-based guidance value | 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| Perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) | 8.2 ng/L | 400,000 ng/L Michigan EGLE state MCL (strictest US state) | Within a historical reference; current applicability unverified | 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| Perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPeA) | 11 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Detected, no limit | 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
23 other PFAS tested — none detected
| Contaminant | Result | Benchmark | Status | Sampled | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11-Chloroeicosafluoro-3-oxaundecane-1-sulfonic acid (11Cl-PF3OUdS) | < 5 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| 1H, 1H, 2H, 2H-perfluorodecane sulfonic acid (8:2 FTS) | < 5 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| 1H, 1H, 2H, 2H-perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (4:2 FTS) | < 3 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| 1H, 1H, 2H, 2H-perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (6:2 FTS) | < 5 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| 4,8-Dioxa-3H-perfluorononanoic acid (ADONA) | < 3 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| 9-Chlorohexadecafluoro-3-oxanone-1-sulfonic acid (9Cl-PF3ONS) | < 2 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| Hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid (HFPO-DA) (GenX chemicals) | < 5 ng/L | 10 ng/L federal MCL (2024) | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| N-ethyl perfluorooctanesulfonamidoacetic acid (NEtFOSAA) | < 5 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-06-13 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| N-methyl perfluorooctanesulfonamidoacetic acid (NMeFOSAA) | < 6 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-06-13 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| Nonafluoro-3,6-dioxaheptanoic acid (NFDHA) | < 20 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| Perfluoro (2-ethoxyethane) sulfonic acid (PFEESA) | < 3 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| Perfluoro-3-methoxypropanoic acid (PFMPA) | < 4 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| Perfluoro-4-methoxybutanoic acid (PFMBA) | < 3 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| Perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA) | < 5 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| Perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA) | < 3 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| Perfluorododecanoic acid (PFDoA) | < 3 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| Perfluoroheptanesulfonic acid (PFHpS) | < 3 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| Perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA) | < 3 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) | < 4 ng/L | 10 ng/L federal MCL (2024) | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| Perfluoropentanesulfonic acid (PFPeS) | < 4 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| Perfluorotetradecanoic acid (PFTA) | < 8 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-06-13 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| Perfluorotridecanoic acid (PFTrDA) | < 7 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-06-13 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
| Perfluoroundecanoic acid (PFUnA) | < 2 ng/L | No federal or state limit; shown for transparency | Not detected above the reporting limit | 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26 | UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318) |
- Result
- 34.8 µg/L
- Benchmark
- 10 µg/L EPA health reference level (screening, not a legal limit)Screening level, not a legal limit
- Status
- Above the referenced health-based guidance value
- Sampled
- 2023-06-13 to 2023-12-26
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
- Result
- 12 ng/L
- Benchmark
- 4.0 ng/L federal MCL (2024)
- Status
- Above a historical reference; current applicability unverified
- Sampled
- 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26
- Result
- 7 PCI/L
- Benchmark
- 5 pCi/L
- Status
- Above the listed reference
- Sampled
- 2017
- Result
- 4.9 ng/L
- Benchmark
- 4.0 ng/L federal MCL (2024)
- Status
- Above a historical reference; current applicability unverified
- Sampled
- 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26
Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS)
- Result
- 6.2 ng/L
- Benchmark
- 10 ng/L federal MCL (2024)
- Status
- Within a historical reference; current applicability unverified
- Sampled
- 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26
- Result
- 2.73 µg/L
- Benchmark
- 15 µg/L federal action level
- Status
- Below the listed reference
- Sampled
- 2022–2024 monitoring period
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS)
- Result
- 5.6 ng/L
- Benchmark
- 2,000 ng/L EPA health advisory (screening, not a legal limit)Screening level, not a legal limit
- Status
- Within the referenced health-based guidance value
- Sampled
- 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26
Perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA)
- Result
- 8.2 ng/L
- Benchmark
- 400,000 ng/L Michigan EGLE state MCL (strictest US state)
- Status
- Within a historical reference; current applicability unverified
- Sampled
- 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26
Perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPeA)
- Result
- 11 ng/L
- Benchmark
- No federal or state limit; shown for transparency
- Status
- Detected, no limit
- Sampled
- 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26
23 other PFAS tested — none detected
11-Chloroeicosafluoro-3-oxaundecane-1-sulfonic acid (11Cl-PF3OUdS)
- Result
- < 5 ng/L
- Benchmark
- No federal or state limit; shown for transparency
- Status
- Not detected above the reporting limit
- Sampled
- 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26
1H, 1H, 2H, 2H-perfluorodecane sulfonic acid (8:2 FTS)
- Result
- < 5 ng/L
- Benchmark
- No federal or state limit; shown for transparency
- Status
- Not detected above the reporting limit
- Sampled
- 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26
1H, 1H, 2H, 2H-perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (4:2 FTS)
- Result
- < 3 ng/L
- Benchmark
- No federal or state limit; shown for transparency
- Status
- Not detected above the reporting limit
- Sampled
- 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26
1H, 1H, 2H, 2H-perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (6:2 FTS)
- Result
- < 5 ng/L
- Benchmark
- No federal or state limit; shown for transparency
- Status
- Not detected above the reporting limit
- Sampled
- 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26
4,8-Dioxa-3H-perfluorononanoic acid (ADONA)
- Result
- < 3 ng/L
- Benchmark
- No federal or state limit; shown for transparency
- Status
- Not detected above the reporting limit
- Sampled
- 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26
9-Chlorohexadecafluoro-3-oxanone-1-sulfonic acid (9Cl-PF3ONS)
- Result
- < 2 ng/L
- Benchmark
- No federal or state limit; shown for transparency
- Status
- Not detected above the reporting limit
- Sampled
- 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26
Hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid (HFPO-DA) (GenX chemicals)
- Result
- < 5 ng/L
- Benchmark
- 10 ng/L federal MCL (2024)
- Status
- Not detected above the reporting limit
- Sampled
- 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26
N-ethyl perfluorooctanesulfonamidoacetic acid (NEtFOSAA)
- Result
- < 5 ng/L
- Benchmark
- No federal or state limit; shown for transparency
- Status
- Not detected above the reporting limit
- Sampled
- 2023-06-13 to 2023-12-26
N-methyl perfluorooctanesulfonamidoacetic acid (NMeFOSAA)
- Result
- < 6 ng/L
- Benchmark
- No federal or state limit; shown for transparency
- Status
- Not detected above the reporting limit
- Sampled
- 2023-06-13 to 2023-12-26
Nonafluoro-3,6-dioxaheptanoic acid (NFDHA)
- Result
- < 20 ng/L
- Benchmark
- No federal or state limit; shown for transparency
- Status
- Not detected above the reporting limit
- Sampled
- 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26
Perfluoro (2-ethoxyethane) sulfonic acid (PFEESA)
- Result
- < 3 ng/L
- Benchmark
- No federal or state limit; shown for transparency
- Status
- Not detected above the reporting limit
- Sampled
- 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26
Perfluoro-3-methoxypropanoic acid (PFMPA)
- Result
- < 4 ng/L
- Benchmark
- No federal or state limit; shown for transparency
- Status
- Not detected above the reporting limit
- Sampled
- 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26
Perfluoro-4-methoxybutanoic acid (PFMBA)
- Result
- < 3 ng/L
- Benchmark
- No federal or state limit; shown for transparency
- Status
- Not detected above the reporting limit
- Sampled
- 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26
- Result
- < 5 ng/L
- Benchmark
- No federal or state limit; shown for transparency
- Status
- Not detected above the reporting limit
- Sampled
- 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26
- Result
- < 3 ng/L
- Benchmark
- No federal or state limit; shown for transparency
- Status
- Not detected above the reporting limit
- Sampled
- 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26
Perfluorododecanoic acid (PFDoA)
- Result
- < 3 ng/L
- Benchmark
- No federal or state limit; shown for transparency
- Status
- Not detected above the reporting limit
- Sampled
- 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26
Perfluoroheptanesulfonic acid (PFHpS)
- Result
- < 3 ng/L
- Benchmark
- No federal or state limit; shown for transparency
- Status
- Not detected above the reporting limit
- Sampled
- 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26
Perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA)
- Result
- < 3 ng/L
- Benchmark
- No federal or state limit; shown for transparency
- Status
- Not detected above the reporting limit
- Sampled
- 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26
- Result
- < 4 ng/L
- Benchmark
- 10 ng/L federal MCL (2024)
- Status
- Not detected above the reporting limit
- Sampled
- 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26
Perfluoropentanesulfonic acid (PFPeS)
- Result
- < 4 ng/L
- Benchmark
- No federal or state limit; shown for transparency
- Status
- Not detected above the reporting limit
- Sampled
- 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26
Perfluorotetradecanoic acid (PFTA)
- Result
- < 8 ng/L
- Benchmark
- No federal or state limit; shown for transparency
- Status
- Not detected above the reporting limit
- Sampled
- 2023-06-13 to 2023-12-26
Perfluorotridecanoic acid (PFTrDA)
- Result
- < 7 ng/L
- Benchmark
- No federal or state limit; shown for transparency
- Status
- Not detected above the reporting limit
- Sampled
- 2023-06-13 to 2023-12-26
Perfluoroundecanoic acid (PFUnA)
- Result
- < 2 ng/L
- Benchmark
- No federal or state limit; shown for transparency
- Status
- Not detected above the reporting limit
- Sampled
- 2023-06-20 to 2023-12-26
Every value is the published result from the cited public record. A reporting limit is the lowest level the method could reliably quantify; a non-detect is not a guarantee of zero.
UCMR5 Analytical Results
UCMR5 Analytical Results: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318)
US EPA
State SDWIS Compliance Record
Lead & Copper Rule 90th-percentile: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318)
US EPA SDWIS
State SDWIS Compliance Record
EPA SDWIS Violations & Enforcement: NEW BALTIMORE REGIONAL (VA6061318)
US EPA SDWIS
Methodology: how we analyze water. Prepared with AI assistance and reviewed by the PurityMap Editorial Team before publication.
Something off with your water's smell, color or taste?
Start with the hot-or-cold tap check. Where New Baltimore Regional reported something related, it's shown below.
- Rotten-egg smell
- Cloudy or milky water
- Chlorine smell
- Brown or yellow water
- Metallic taste
Lead at New Baltimore Regional: 2.73 µg/L (90th percentile, 2022–2024 monitoring period). Lead has no taste, so a taste neither shows nor rules it out.