Forensic evidence record · ev-tx0900003-f-pampa-lithium

Lithium

A single published measurement record with its qualifier, sampling context, source identifier, method note, and stated limitations kept together.

Published evidence record

52.8 µg/LReported measurement
Back to water-system profile
52.8 µg/Lreported result
Not verified from sourcereporting limit
Sample date: 2023-02-27 to 2023-11-14sample date
2026-10-15publication date
Source observations (10)
  • lithium — Sample date: 2023-02-27

    Detected above reporting limit. = 32.3 µg/L

    Reporting limit: 9 µg/L. Detection limit: Not available. Benchmark unavailable

    Source: src-ucmr5-2024 · UCMR5_All.txt · Sample Q2307834001 · Method EPA 200.7

  • lithium — Sample date: 2023-05-03

    Detected above reporting limit. = 40.2 µg/L

    Reporting limit: 9 µg/L. Detection limit: Not available. Benchmark unavailable

    Source: src-ucmr5-2024 · UCMR5_All.txt · Sample Q2316777001 · Method EPA 200.7

  • lithium — Sample date: 2023-08-08

    Detected above reporting limit. = 40.9 µg/L

    Reporting limit: 9 µg/L. Detection limit: Not available. Benchmark unavailable

    Source: src-ucmr5-2024 · UCMR5_All.txt · Sample Q2332389001 · Method EPA 200.7

  • lithium — Sample date: 2023-11-14

    Detected above reporting limit. = 36.1 µg/L

    Reporting limit: 9 µg/L. Detection limit: Not available. Benchmark unavailable

    Source: src-ucmr5-2024 · UCMR5_All.txt · Sample Q2348681001 · Method EPA 200.7

  • lithium — Sample date: 2023-02-27

    Detected above reporting limit. = 34.9 µg/L

    Reporting limit: 9 µg/L. Detection limit: Not available. Benchmark unavailable

    Source: src-ucmr5-2024 · UCMR5_All.txt · Sample Q2307834003 · Method EPA 200.7

  • lithium — Sample date: 2023-08-08

    Detected above reporting limit. = 52.8 µg/L

    Reporting limit: 9 µg/L. Detection limit: Not available. Benchmark unavailable

    Source: src-ucmr5-2024 · UCMR5_All.txt · Sample Q2332389003 · Method EPA 200.7

  • lithium — Sample date: 2023-02-27

    Detected above reporting limit. = 34.3 µg/L

    Reporting limit: 9 µg/L. Detection limit: Not available. Benchmark unavailable

    Source: src-ucmr5-2024 · UCMR5_All.txt · Sample Q2307834005 · Method EPA 200.7

  • lithium — Sample date: 2023-08-08

    Detected above reporting limit. = 39.9 µg/L

    Reporting limit: 9 µg/L. Detection limit: Not available. Benchmark unavailable

    Source: src-ucmr5-2024 · UCMR5_All.txt · Sample Q2332389005 · Method EPA 200.7

  • lithium — Sample date: 2023-02-27

    Detected above reporting limit. = 24 µg/L

    Reporting limit: 9 µg/L. Detection limit: Not available. Benchmark unavailable

    Source: src-ucmr5-2024 · UCMR5_All.txt · Sample Q2307834007 · Method EPA 200.7

  • lithium — Sample date: 2023-08-08

    Detected above reporting limit. = 25.4 µg/L

    Reporting limit: 9 µg/L. Detection limit: Not available. Benchmark unavailable

    Source: src-ucmr5-2024 · UCMR5_All.txt · Sample Q2332389007 · Method EPA 200.7

Measurement evidence

Analyte
Lithium
Result qualifier
=
Reference basis
10.0 µg/L EPA health reference level (screening, not a legal limit)
Sampling location
Entry Point to Distribution
Water system ID
TX0900003
Source ID
src-ucmr5-2024

Laboratory context

No laboratory method note was published with this record.

Sampling context

This result represents a entry point to distribution sample. It does not establish the condition at every distribution point or household tap.

Record limitation

System-level entry-point monitoring; not a measurement of the water at an individual household tap.

Source provenance

UCMR5 Analytical Results

Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR5) — PFAS occurrence data

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency · Published 2024

Nationwide entry-point monitoring for 29 PFAS and lithium under the fifth UCMR cycle. Results are entry-point-to-distribution samples, not household-tap measurements.

How to interpret this record

This page preserves one measurement. Interpretation requires its qualifier, reporting limit, reference basis, date, sampling location, and limitations; the number alone is not a safety verdict.

Review finding states →

Related intelligence