State ranking · updated 2026-11-09

PFAS in Tap Water by State: Share of Cities Above the Limit (2026)

50 states ranked by share of city reports with a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit, from public EPA records (EPA UCMR 5 (2024)). It ranks the published record, not which water is safest.

Quick answer

New Jersey tops this list in 2026

New Jersey is first, at 65% (share of city reports with a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit). Alaska (60%), Delaware (58%), Connecticut (58%) and South Carolina (48%) follow. Hawaii (0%) and North Dakota (0%) are last on this list.

The ranking

All 50 ranked states

  1. 1New Jersey162 city reports105 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit65%
  2. 2Alaska5 city reports3 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit60%
  3. 3Delaware12 city reports7 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit58%
  4. 4Connecticut26 city reports15 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit58%
  5. 5South Carolina75 city reports36 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit48%
  6. 6Florida214 city reports99 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit46%
  7. 7North Carolina128 city reports58 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit45%
  8. 8Massachusetts163 city reports71 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit44%
  9. 9New Hampshire18 city reports7 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit39%
  10. 10Rhode Island13 city reports5 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit38%
  11. 11Alabama129 city reports48 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit37%
  12. 12Pennsylvania121 city reports41 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit34%
  13. 13California398 city reports113 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit28%
  14. 14Georgia125 city reports32 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit26%
  15. 15Nebraska14 city reports3 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit21%
  16. 16Nevada14 city reports3 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit21%
  17. 17West Virginia19 city reports4 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit21%
  18. 18New York145 city reports28 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit19%
  19. 19Texas381 city reports69 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit18%
  20. 20Ohio142 city reports25 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit18%
  21. 21Washington122 city reports21 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit17%
  22. 22Arizona54 city reports9 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit17%
  23. 23Tennessee146 city reports24 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit16%
  24. 24Maryland31 city reports5 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit16%
  25. 25Virginia64 city reports10 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit16%
  26. 26Maine13 city reports2 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit15%
  27. 27Iowa40 city reports6 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit15%
  28. 28Kentucky83 city reports12 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit14%
  29. 29Minnesota99 city reports13 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit13%
  30. 30Oklahoma52 city reports6 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit12%
  31. 31Indiana90 city reports10 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit11%
  32. 32New Mexico30 city reports3 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit10%
  33. 33Montana10 city reports1 city report had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit10%
  34. 34Oregon65 city reports6 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit9%
  35. 35Kansas33 city reports3 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit9%
  36. 36Wyoming12 city reports1 city report had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit8%
  37. 37Idaho25 city reports2 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit8%
  38. 38Wisconsin95 city reports7 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit7%
  39. 39Colorado96 city reports7 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit7%
  40. 40Louisiana71 city reports5 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit7%
  41. 41Illinois220 city reports15 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit7%
  42. 42South Dakota16 city reports1 city report had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit6%
  43. 43Mississippi46 city reports2 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit4%
  44. 44Missouri72 city reports3 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit4%
  45. 45Utah70 city reports2 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit3%
  46. 46Michigan137 city reports2 city reports had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit1%
  47. 47Arkansas56 city reportsNo city report had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit0%
  48. 48Vermont9 city reportsNo city report had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit0%
  49. 49North Dakota8 city reportsNo city report had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit0%
  50. 50Hawaii13 city reportsNo city report had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit0%

1 states excluded. States with fewer than 4 city reports on record are excluded rather than shown with an unstable percentage. Excluded states are not scored as favourable.

Methodology and limitations

How this snapshot is built

  1. How this snapshot is built

    For each state, the share of PurityMap city reports that had a PFAS sample above a 2024 EPA limit (PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, PFNA or GenX) in EPA's UCMR 5 testing. EPA's 2024 limits are judged on a yearly average, and water systems have until 2029 to meet them, so a single sample is not a violation. States are ordered by that share, highest first, then by count.

  2. Reading the order

    UCMR 5 sampled larger public systems; a state share reflects the cities on record, not every private well or small system. Levels at a tap depend on the local supplier and plumbing.

  3. Exclusions

    1 excluded. States with fewer than 4 city reports on record are excluded rather than shown with an unstable percentage.

Read with care

Comparable does not mean complete.

This ranking compares states on one measure. It never replaces a full system report, a city-resolution check, or a certified household test, and missing monitoring is excluded, never scored as favourable.